Traditionally, certain monks have taken a vow of silence as an act of dedication to the Lord. They set aside a certain amount of time to keep their mouths shut so they could learn to listen to God. It was believed that thirty, sixty, ninety days, and even a year of silence might help them in their walk of faith.
Often, these experiments in discipline result in worship of a person’s willpower more than God. People thought, “If they can be silent for that long, they must truly be a spiritual person.” And if thirty days were a sign of a mature faith, then a year could only be achieved by the most spiritual people on earth.
As a result of all the ways this can be distorted, it is now a fringe activity done by a handful of people. And yet, I would like to suggest to you that a vow of silence might not be an entirely bad thing. I don’t mean total silence; rather, what if you committed yourself to keeping your mouth shut whenever you feel like you need to correct people?
Imagine a new believer is talking about a passage of scripture they read and how they felt the comfort of the Lord in the words. Meanwhile, you know that they are using the passage a little out of context. Could you vow to keep your mouth shut and let this person grow in their faith rather than trying to instruct them at the moment?
Or picture a conversation in which you hear a fellow believer mention a passage of scripture you have studied in detail. Could you keep your mouth shut and not ramble on about all you know?
Possibly, there will be a time when you are having a religious conversation with people of varying backgrounds. Could you keep your mouth shut instead of trying to convince everyone of your theological perspective?
One true sign of spiritual maturity is knowing your scriptures and what they mean. I also think another sign is letting people talk and not feeling like you have to make everyone see it from your viewpoint.
What would happen if you vowed to listen more than you speak?